Unidroit

UNIDROIT

There is a pulse thumping tendency for many of the main line media and politicians to respond, with a knee jerk reflex, to Americans speaking out against government abuses, to label the speaker a “Conspiracy Theorist”.

To argue the First Amendment Right to say these things is usually to no avail, especially with those whose mind is made up, regardless of the facts in front of them.

For the most part that propensity concerns me not. I still will speak the truth when I see it.

Here’s a set of truths which I will present to you for your perusal. You draw your own conclusions as to whether a ‘conspiracy’ presents itself.

One late night session of research in 1996 found me frustrated and unable to continue what I thought was a viable line of reasoning with regards to writing some legal documents. No matter what I tried, I met with a mental block.

At about 3:00 AM I decided to drop what I was doing and ‘play’ on the Internet, just to try to clear my mind.

One subject that I had filed away in my mental ‘to do’ basket was to see if I could track the evolution of the Uniform Commercial Code back to its inception.

It occurred to me that if there was a Uniform Commercial Code in America, there was most probably one in other parts of the world.

If that was the case, and following the rationale prompted by all the tie-ins I had found with the United Nations, and so-called unified and treaty related laws, I typed in the words “International Commercial Code”, hit ‘Enter’ and sat back.

What popped up on the screen was a revelation, to say the least.

The next couple of hours were spent reading and printing out several hundred pages of information off a website of an organization titled “UNIDROIT”.  http://www.unidroit.org/

This set of documents tied together several different earlier pieces of research that were the subject of many animated conversations with other members of the community of legal researchers with whom I communicated and met on a regular basis.

It was well into the afternoon of the following day when I finally had everything collated and put into a reasonable semblance of logical order.

I called my friend the Informer, and discussed this with him. He agreed with the conclusions, as did Jim Montgomery, and several others with whom I talked over the course of the next weeks.

Now I find that I have the time and inclination to share this information with you.

UNIDROIT is the acronym for “International Institute for the Unification of Private Law”.

The website states that UNIDROIT was “set up in 1926 as an auxiliary organ of the League of Nations.”

Further, when the League folded, it was “reestablished in 1940 on the basis of a multilateral agreement, the UNIDROIT Statute.”

The term “Statute” is very interesting. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, defines Statute as “A formal written enactment of a legislative body, whether federal, state, city, or county.” It goes on to say that a statute is made a law of the state, and that it may be public or private.

There are 59 member “States” to the Statute, and the United States Of America is one of those “States.”

The website lays out the objectives. Of particular interest to me is the statement that UNIDROIT applies to primarily “private law”, “However, experience has demonstrated the necessity of permitting occasional incursions into public law,……….”.

OK, folks, let’s see where this portion has taken.

First, let me bring to your attention the fact that we have here an international legislative body making statutory law and applying same to the United States of America, albeit through agreement.

Second, we have the correlation with the language found in the United Nations Publication “System of National Accounts 1993”, page xxxvii, “Forerunners of the System National Accounts”, which ties that accounting system methodology back to the League of Nations, and decrees the way the member States, including the United States of America, should view accounting in conjunction with the European Community, the I.M.F. (See 12 USC 286), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and others.

For those of you who haven’t studied that book, and you should, if you can get your hands on a copy, the concept labels all of you as institutional units to be controlled by governmental units.

The UNIDROIT site also shows Co-operation with other international “Organizations”. This gives rise to the uneasy feeling that out there in the world, there are at least a couple of “Organizations” who are cooperating and legislating laws to be applied here, in America.

No conspiracy here, is there? We’ll see.

If you have Internet access, by now you should be looking a the UNIDROIT website. If not, you might want to.

Look at “Work Programme for the 2002-2004 Triennium”.

Triennium??? How long is that? Three years. It is the “programme” for the next three years.

Look at “Achievements”.

Read the dates of the various Conventions mentioned there. I dare say the list is not a complete one.

With those dates in mind, let me call your attention to the United States Statutes at Large, particularly the 1963 issue, Volume 77.

The first point of reflection is PL 88-243, Titled “District of Columbia Uniform Commercial Code”.

Enacted is Section 28 of the D.C. Code. This is found at page 630 (77 Stat. 530).

Page 631 “Part 1-Short Title, Construction, Application and Subject Matter”. Look at §28:1-105.

NOTE! For the records, as I write this I have the Statutes At Large cited and the 2001 West Edition of §28 of the D.C. Code on the table next to me. These are the words as written. Also keep in mind that since the December 30, 1963 enactment of the code cites, there have been revisions which change section numbers from the prior, 1981 Edition, to new numbers in some cases. The quoted cites herein are from the 77 Stat 630 et seq. pages unless otherwise stated.

28:1-105 tells us that “Except as provided hereafter in this section, when a transaction bears a reasonable relation to the District and also to a state or nation the parties may agree that the law either of the District or of such state or nation shall govern their rights and duties Failing such agreement this subtitle applies to transactions bearing an appropriate relation to the District.”

What is this telling us, folks?

I believe that this tells us unless we have a clear agreement, before we undertake to do anything relating to the District, before we do that thing, the presumption is that the law in District is applied.

Now, for those of you who have my earlier column relating to the transmutation of the District of Columbia into a state, let me give the language of §28:1-105 from the 2001 West version of the D.C. Code.

“(1) Except as provided hereafter in this section, when a transaction bears a reasonable relation to the District and also to a state or nation, the parties may agree that the law either of the District or of the other state or nation shall govern their rights and duties. Failing such agreement, this subtitle applies to transactions bearing an appropriate relation to this state.” (Emphasis added).

Here it is folks, up close and personal….in your face, if you need further proof that the District is not a ‘super state’, and no longer the seat of our original jurisdiction government.

Whatever you do that has any minimal contact (remember the old International Shoe case about minimum contact?) creates the nexus necessary to drag you into “this state” forum of law(s).

Let me go off on a tangent for a moment.

At the end of PL 88-243, page 775 of the Statutes, at (d) it is stated “The following British statutes shall no longer have any force or effect in the District of Columbia:
        (1) 9 and 10 William LLL (1698), chapter 17, sec. 3 (D.C. Code, 1961 ed. sec. 28-410)
        (2) 3 and 4 Anne (1704), chapter 9, secs. 7 and 8 (D.C. Code, 1961 ed., sec. 28-920)

Doesn’t this tell us, in no uncertain terms, that;

        A) Those British statutes were in full force and effect in the District until December 30, 1963.
        B) There is every reason to believe that there are other British statutes still in effect in the District.
        C) This doesn’t deal with the question, though it is a very real issue, of what other British statutes still are in full force and effect in the District, and, for that matter, outside of the District, on the soil of America, either actually or by silent judicial notice and presumption.

Those of you who want to see how that evolve need only read the rest of the 1783 Treaty of Paris from Volume 5 of the Statutes, on Treaty(s) and the case The Society for the Protection of the Gospel vs. New Haven, 4 Wheat. 464.

Back to work….any evidence of a conspiracy starting to raise its ugly head yet?

Let me slap you in the brain with a final and telling blow of knowledge that should settle the issue for you, once and for all.

From the Statutes at Large, PL 88-244, immediately following (no surprise here) PL 88-243, a Joint Resolution (H.J. Res. 778) of December 30, 1963, the same day as 243, can you believe it???? “To provide for participation by the Government of the United States [not of America– my comment] in the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International (Rome) Institute for the Unification of Private Law, and authorizing appropriations therefor.”

Again, dear readers, surprise, surprise, surprise! UNIDROIT is located in Rome, and the Congress is providing for the inculcation of foreign law and statutes as operative on American soil.

In this resolution Congress authorizes the President to accept membership in these two organizations.

This membership, by direct terms and conditions of the agreements, places the edicts of the foreign legislative governmental and non-governmental bodies into practice here, in America.

The UNIDROIT website lays out the full text of the various conventions in the Hague, Ottawa, Geneva, Brussels, and other foreign nations under which the President bound you and me to be governed.

This is what the second paragraph of Article IV of the Constitution is all about.

“……..;and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States [not of America–my comment, again], shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

What that means is that the attorneys who negotiated the various treaties, and by the way, wrote the text of the Constitution, knew what they were doing. They were paving the way for the continued enrichment of and guaranteeing employment, forever, of their progeny, by saddling us with foreign made law, operative on our soil.

Remember, both private and public law are covered.

Anyone not seeing the specter of a major, pernicious, long term and invasive conspiracy in this set of facts?

I would appreciate your comments, particularly explaining how this is not a conspiracy to subjugate the private property rights, liberty, and freedom to do what we want to do, without foreign interference.

Virtually everything anyone does today, with regards to finance, banking, buying and selling goods and services, is done under the Uniform Commercial Code-UNIDROIT-foreign made and foreign controlled law/statute.

Now, for all of those participating in the so-called ‘Redemption’ process supposedly attempting to get your ‘Sovereign Status’, I have news for you.

When you “accept for value” the documents sent you by the 28 USC 3002 (15) Federal Corporation, its agencies, departments, commissions, boards, other entities, or an instrumentality thereof, such as the Compact Party “this State”, County, or City, you are doing just the opposite of what you are endeavoring to do.

First you probably have not taken the time to look up the word “accept” in a good law dictionary. The act of ‘accepting’ is “Acceptance”. Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, at page twelve, tells you that acceptance constitutes “a tacit agreement to a preceding act, which might have been defeated or avoided if that acceptance had not been made.”

Guess what, folks. By the act of acceptance, you bound yourself, through your loud proclamations incorporating the Uniform Commercial Code into your acceptance, to ‘their’ foreign law forum.

You have, in form and fact, also dignified the underlying premises that were precedent to that document, or whatever.

Is it any wonder this stuff doesn’t really work?

My opinion is that those few and minor incidents where it appears that the “Redemption” process has worked, is simply that the officials involved just did not have the time or inclination to put up with the nonsense involved or, in the alternative, are letting a few, insignificant things look like they are successfully defeated, thereby sucking in even more who blindly follow the “Redemption” process. I believe at some point in time, the net will be closed, and those who think they are being successful will be scooped up, like sardines, and canned.

It might be a good exercise to contact your various Congressional Representatives, Senators, State Legislators, and whoever else strike your fancy and ask the question, “Is this true?”

Explain what I have given you, in short form. They will understand.

It is a bitter pill to swallow, but true, nonetheless.

Let’s hear someone refute these facts, and support that with the evidence to controvert what I have provided for your education.

God Bless this Great Republic

D. Tom

 http://web.archive.org/web/20050116173538/http://atgpress.com/dtom/dt009.htm

You are a slave since 1933  — Comment on this, see file Howard G

http://university.ucadia.info/e107_plugins/content/content.php
Therefore under the UCC Slave Laws which most slave plantations of the
world operate you can … commercial transaction document we know as the
live birth record, … The word was created from the combination of two
ancient pre-Vatican Latin … no rights unless they know Canon Law
concerning juridic persons and …
<
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/download/file.php?id=3879>

http://university.ucadia.info/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.24

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is a valid Form of Deed Poll and therefore Deed and Contract whereby a

True Person first expresses, affirms and conveys certain rights to another party who are then lawfully

bound upon proof of receipt in accordance with the Canons defined under Article 133 of Canonun De

Ius Positivum.

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is permitted to be issued when an inferior Roman Person rejects the rule of

law and seeks to assert an untenable and illogical position of superior rights over Divine Law.

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is a valid Form of Deed Poll and therefore Deed and Contract whereby a

True Person first expresses, affirms and conveys certain rights to another party who are then lawfully

bound upon proof of receipt in accordance with the Canons defined under Article 133 of Canonun De

Ius Positivum. . An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is permitted to be issued when an inferior Roman Person

rejects the rule of law and seeks to assert an untenable and illogical position of superior rights over

Divine Law.

A World of Slavery

You are “legally” a slave, just as your parents, your grandparents and great grandparents were slaves.

You may be lucky enough to live in a pleasant plantation with other slaves, managed by overseer slaves

such as police, judges, doctors and politicians where few examples of slave cruelty occur. Or you may

be witnessing changes in the community plantation, which is part of a state slave plantation and

national slave plantation where there is more crime, more misery and death. The fact that you are a

slave is unquestionable. The only unknown is whether you will permit your children and their children

to also grow up as slaves.

You are a slave because since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of

the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary

into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby

also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

You are a slave because since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the

higher Estate knowingly and willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract

is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the

baby onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby

away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a

promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then

conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the

promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien

is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against

the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.

You are a slave because since 1540 and the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Act, deriving its power from

the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III of the same year, whenever a child is baptized and a

Baptismal Certificate is issued by the state at birth or church, the parents have knowingly or

unknowingly gifted, granted and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” Cestui Que Vie Trust owner

by Roman Cult, who has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since, managed by the Temple

Bar since 1540 and subsequent Bar Associations from the 19th Century representing the reconstituted

“Galla” responsible as Grim Reapers for reaping the souls, or salvage also known as “salvation of

souls”.

Therefore under the UCC Slave Laws which most slave plantations of the world operate you can never

own a house, even though they trick into believing you do; you never really own a car, or boat or any

other object, only have the benefit of use. Indeed, you do not even own your own body, which is

claimed to have been lawfully gifted by your parents at your birth in the traditions of old slave

contracts in which the slave baby had its feet or hands dipped in ink, or a drop of blood spilt on the

commercial transaction document we know as the live birth record, against which a CUSIP number is

issued and sold the the central bank. Yes, the banks claim your flesh, the banks are indeed the modern

slave owners, hiding these indisputable facts upon which their money system is built from the people.

You may not realize you are a slave under the slave laws of Uniform Commercial Codes (UCC), but

may still erroneously believe you are slave with “more rights” as used to be afforded under “Common

Law” until it was largely abolished back in 1933 without properly telling you. The word “common”

comes from 14th Century Latin communis meaning “to entrust, commit to a burden, public duty,

service or obligation”. The word was created from the combination of two ancient pre-Vatican Latin

words com/comitto = “to entrust, commit” and munis = “burden, public duty, service or obligation”. In

other words, the real meaning of common as first formed because of the creation of the Roman Trust

over the planet is the concept of “voluntary servitude” or simply “voluntary enslavement”.

Common Law is nothing more than the laws of “voluntary servitude” and the laws of “voluntary

slavery” to the Roman Cult and the Venetian Slavemasters. It is the job of the overseer slaves to

convince you that you are not slaves, the common law still exists and has not been largely abolished

and replaced with commercial law, to confuse you, to give you false hope. In return, they are rewarded

as loyal slaves with bigger homes to use and more privileges than other slaves.

The reason why the overseer slaves such as judges, politicians, bankers, actors and media personalities

are forced to lie and deny we are all slaves is because the slave system of voluntary servitude or

“common law” was not the first global slave system, but merely its evolution. Before the emergence of

Common Law, we were all subject to being considered mere animals or things under Canon Law of the

Roman Cult, also known as the Law of the See, or Admiralty Law.

Under Admiralty Law, you are either a slave of the ship of state, or merely cargo for lawful salvage.

Thus in 1302 through Unam Sanctam, the Roman Cult unlawfully claimed through trust the ownership

of all the planet and all living “things” as either slaves, or less than slaves with things administered

through the Court of Rota. This court, claimed as the Supreme Court of all Courts on the planet was

initially abolished in the 16th Century only to be returned in 1908 under Pope Pius X as a purely

spiritual ecclesiastical court of 12 “apostolic prothonotary” spirits, implying the twelve apostles. Since

then, this new purely spiritual court has remained in constant “session”, with the local courts using

these powers to administer Divine Immortal Spirits expressed in Trust into Flesh Vessels as mere dead

things.

Yet this is not the only form of slave law still in force today. Instead, the oldest, the most evil and based

on false history are the slave laws of the Menasheh, also known as the Rabbi through the unholy

document of hate first formed in 333 known as the Talmud of the Menasheh- the false Israelites.

Through the Talmud of the false Israelites, the whole planet is enslaved with the servants of the

“chosen people” known as Caananites or K-nights (Knights) also known as the Scythians and then the

rest as the goy/gyu and goyim – namely meaning the cattle, the dead lifeless corpses.

Ultimately, you are a slave because you remain profoundly influenced by your education and

community at large and because many choose to continue to think and act like a slave, waiting for

someone to help them, tell them what to do and be happy accepting bread crumbs of benefits when the

system has reaped millions of dollars – yes millions of dollars – of your energy.

A prison designed with no way out

Before this time, the system of global slavery and the treatment of the world as one large slave

plantation was designed so there is no way out – as evidenced through the courts of the priests of Ba’al

known as the judges of most legal systems in the world.

Even the most educated of men and women may remain tricked into believing that upon self

representation they may claim their “common law rights” as a means of defense, only to find the judge

lawfully rejects any and all claims. As the first law of the courts is the Uniform Commercial Codes of

slavery as introduced in 1933, the defendant is an employee of a corporation and therefore

automatically assumes the liability of any injury. Unless they can pay, they may be sent to prison.

If such a trickster as the judge is challenged, they are permitted to escape to their chambers and call

upon even greater power to return and magically establish a new court, without telling the defendant

they have now entered Admiralty Court, or the laws of the See in accordance with Canon Law of the

Roman Cult issued in 1983. Now the judge can impose grave penalties upon such an unresponsive

defendant including contempt of court and other punitive prison sentences, with the defendant having

no rights unless they know Canon Law concerning juridic persons and establishing standing above

being called a “thing”.

Sadly, few people actually know the original meaning of “thing” as a judicial meeting, or assembly; a

matter brought before a court of law; a legal process; a charge brought; or a suit or cause pleaded

before a court. This meaning is then used with devastating effect through the heretical concept of Pius

X from 1908 to claim the dead apostles sit in permanent and open session as the “twelve

prothonotaries” of the Sacred Rota – as the highest Supreme Court on the planet. So when a man or

woman receives a blue or yellow notice from a court issued through this unholy knowledge of Canon

law, by the time they come to court, they are automatically a thing. When a man or woman seeks to

defend themselves by seeking to speak before the judge, they automatically “consent” to being a thing.

Thus a judge with knowledge of such trickery can silence any man or woman by “lawfully” threatening

contempt of court if the “thing” does not stop making noise.

Indeed, it is the Roman Cult Canon Law of 1983 that establishes all courts are oratories, with judges

holding ecclesiastical powers as “ordinaries” and their chambers as “chapels”. Thus the Bar

Associations around the world have assisted judges in learning of their new powers in order to

counteract those men and women who continue to wake up to their status as slaves, but demonstrating

how to remain “in honor” with such perverse law and ensure such “terrorists” are sent to prison for

long sentences as a warning to others.

If a judge so inclined to ensure an educated defendant is lawfully sent to prison or worse, he or she may

run away for a third and final time to their chamber and invoke their most powerful standing as rabbi of

a Talmud Court under the Talmudic Laws of the false Israelites of the House of the twelve tribes of

Menasheh. Now, even a judge in a nation that is against the death penalty may choose to impose a

“lawful” sentence against any goy/gyu or goyim who dares injure an Israelite – which is normally

death. However, while judges in the United States and other nations have started to be trained in the reimposition

of Talmudic Law, it is at the hands of the false Menasheh, also known as the Scythians, also

known as the Black Khazars and now the Ashkenazi.

Ultimately, it is enough for judges, clerks and members of the Bar to know that they hold our property

in their Cestui Que Vie Trusts and that we are completely without effective rights, until we challenge

their fraud.

Yet, even when you challenge their fraud, many deny and outright lie on the records- yes judges

absolutely committing perjury on the record to deny they hold trustee and executor powers with the

case being a constructive trust and executor of the Cestui que Vie Trust from which powers are being

drawn for the form of the court.

So how might a man or woman defend themselves against a private and secret society that has

kidnapped the law, that refuses to tell the truth, that lies to its own members and refuses to provide fair

remedy. This is the purpose of the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll.

Ecclesiastical Deed Poll

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is permitted to be issued when an inferior Roman Person rejects the rule of

law and seeks to assert an untenable and illogical position of superior rights over Divine Law.

Only a True Person may issue an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll. By definition an inferior Roman Person has

no authority to issue an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll.

An Ecclesiastical Deed Poll must always be on standard sized robin-egg blue paper, printed in serif

font, in recognition and respect of its status as a Divine Notice with the full authority of One Heaven, in

particular the Sacred Rota and twelve Apostolic Prothonotaries as well as Apostolic Prothorabban of

the Divine Sanhedrin.

When an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is issued, it is under the Supreme Court of One Heaven with the full

authority of the Divine Creator and all inferior courts including the Sacred Rota. Hence the term Per

Curiam Divina is always included to make clear to the inferior Roman person the absolute authority of

the instrument.

While a True Person issues an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll, it is ultimately a Divine Notice of Protest and

Dishonor from the Divine Creator. Therefore, the dishonor of an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is the most

grievous injury of the law and blasphemy to all believed to be Divine.

While a True Person issues an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll, it is ultimately a Divine Notice of Protest and

Dishonor from the Divine Creator. Therefore, the dishonor of an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll is the most

grievous injury of the law and blasphemy to all believed to be Divine.

When a Roman slave under inferior Roman law repudiates a valid Ecclesiastical Deed Poll then by

definition all acts undertaken with the assumed authority of Sacred Rota by any clerk, protonotary,

prothonotary, plenipotentiary or minister are null and void, including and not limited to any warrants,

summons, orders, decrees.

Source of this page: http://one-heaven.org/ecclesiastical_deed_poll/edp_introduction.htm

Continue to EDP FAQ

Continue to Step #1

_________

Copyright © One-Heaven.Org Ab Initio. All Rights Reserved

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s