S Mahmoud-Davis – Health Matrix, 2010 – litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com
++ JD Candidate, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, 2010; MA, The University
of Chicago, 1999; AB, Cornell University, 1997. I must thank my husband, Charles, for his enduring
love and support that sustains me in all my efforts, and for the great sacrifices that he has …
Related articles – All 2 versions
K Schumacher – T. Jefferson L. Rev., 1999 – HeinOnline
THOMAS JEFFERSON LAW REVIEW [Vol. 22:89 be extended to vaccinations? Finally, Part IV
offers solutions, which would allow informed consent and the public good to co- exist. PARTI
INFORMED CONSENT A. WHAT IS INFORMED CONSENT? Informed consent is defined …
Cited by 11 – Related articles – All 4 versions
[PDF] from upenn.eduS Gellman… – U. Pa. J. Const. L., 2007 – HeinOnline
If you have to drive in a Phillips head screw, you can use a flathead screwdriver, if that’s the only
tool you’ve got. It may do the job fine. But if you have a perfectly good Phillips head screwdriver
in your toolbox, why not use that instead? Establishment Clause law is in flux-indeed, it …
Cited by 12 – Related articles – All 5 versions
MC Smith – Ark. L. Rev., 2005 – HeinOnline
Compulsory immunization statutes have been in existence in the United States since the
mid-nineteenth century.’ Along with compulsory education statutes, state legislatures mandated
compulsory immunization for all children as a prerequisite to attendance.2 Originally, …
Related articles – All 3 versions
S Coletti – Conn. L. Rev., 2003 – HeinOnline
I. INTRODUCTION Robyni was frustrated with the current system of vaccination exemp-
tions. She did not feel that the chickenpox vaccine was necessary. She wanted her children to
be exposed to chickenpox so they could develop immunity to the disease the natural way. …
Cited by 15 – Related articles – BL Direct – All 3 versions
RD Silverman – Annals Health L., 2003 – HeinOnline
No More Kidding Around: Restructuring Non-Medical Childhood Immunization Exemptions to
Ensure Public Health Protection Ross D. Silverman* “A lot of states call their exemptions
religious, but anyone who wants it, gets it.” – Daniel A. Salmon, MPH, Johns Hopkins …
Cited by 31 – Related articles – All 6 versions
RD Silverman… – Margins, 2001 – HeinOnline
State-enforced vaccination of children represents the exercise of civil authority over individual
judgment. While public health is a valid social good and a legitimate basis for state action (as
we will discuss below), it is not the only good that must be considered when establishing …
Cited by 4 – Related articles – All 4 versions
JW Sapsin, LO Gostin, JS Vernick… – Temp. L. Rev., 2004 – HeinOnline
SARS AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PREPAREDNESS+ Jason W. Saps in Lawrence O.
Gostin* Jon S. Vernick*” Scott Burris*”* Stephen P. Terei**** I. Introduction The disease known
now as severe acute respiratory syndrome (“SARS”) first emerged in November 2002 in …
Cited by 18 – Related articles – All 4 versions
CL Kraus – Hofstra L. Rev., 2001 – HeinOnline
Conflict arising as a result of the tension between church and state has plagued American society
since its inception. “‘Man’s dedication has often been torn between God and country, religious
faith and patriotism. Church and state have been the most significant institutions within …
Cited by 8 – Related articles – BL Direct – All 3 versions
| CONTACT: Kathryn Serkes (202) 333 3855, firstname.lastname@example.orgNovember 16, 2007
For Immediate Release:DOCTORS OPPOSE MARYLAND VACCINE ROUNDUP:
Expect dangerous reactions when children are treated like cattle
Washington, D.C. — The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons today condemned the “vaccine roundup” executed in Prince George’s county Maryland this week, and promised to do everything it can to support parents who refuse to immunize their children.
“This power play obliterates informed consent and parental rights,” said Kathryn Serkes, director of policy for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), one of the few national physician groups that refuse corporate funding from pharmaceutical companies.
In a scenario reminiscent of cattle round-ups, the state’s attorney has issued summons to more than 1600 parents of children who have not provided certificates of immunization for their children. But instead of toting a cattle prod, this state’s attorney chooses to wield a syringe to keep the “herd” in line.
Parents have been told to appear in Court on Saturday, and to subject their children to on-the-spot state-mandated vaccines of up 17 vaccine doses, or face imprisonment. Parents who ignore the court’s demands could face a $50 fine for every day their child is out of compliance or up to 10 days in jail.
“This campaign of intimidation to brutally enforce blanket vaccine mandates by government agencies and the school district gives no consideration for the rights of the parents or the individual medical condition of the child,” said Serkes.
Children should be carefully screened, medical records taken and decisions made carefully – not in an ad hoc assembly-line clinic in a county courtroom and under the brutal watch of law enforcement. This is a man-made disaster ready to waiting to detonate. Children could receive a dangerous cocktail of several vaccines without proper examinations. “The procedure is reckless and subjects children to the risk of severe reactions. Physicians would not be allowed to treat children in this way, without individual histories and physical exams – or informed consent,” said Jane M. Orient, M.D., AAPS Executive Director.
Money and politics may be at the center of the round of threats. The school district will lose a substantial amount of state funding if students do not comply with the vaccine mandate. “Apparently the district wants that money, even if it gets it off the backs of children,” said Serkes.
Mr. Ivey apparently has no problem invoking his own right to informed consent and parental control. In a radio interview on Thursday, he admitted that he has chosen to refuse the hepatitis B vaccines for his own children. “It’s interesting that parents have to ask the state’s permission by filing a form if they want to make the same decision for their children that he made for his own,” said Dr. Orient.
But his galling hypocrisy clearly demonstrates that not every vaccine is right for every child.
In their efforts to help the targeted parents, AAPS is contacting as many of them as possible to educate them about their rights under Maryland law and questions to ask before deciding whether vaccination is appropriate for their child (see below). “We’ll do our best to help the parents make an informed decision,” said Serkes. Representatives will also be on hand at the courthouse on Saturday, and AAPS is working to set up a legal team to help parents who refuse the vaccinations.
AAPS will also work with the National Vaccine Information Center to make sure parents are informed on how to report any adverse reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Such reporting is actually required, but even medical professionals are lax about filing the reports. Don’t expect the police to do it. The State’s Attorney General, the manufacturers, and the people giving the shots are immune from liability if the shots hurt somebody, however.
AAPS is also acting as coordinator for the “Hands Off Our Kids” coalition of parents across the country who were instrumental in overturning Texas Governor Perry’s executive order requiring the HPV vaccine for school girls last spring. The coalition is appealing to Gov. O’Malley to intervene in the case and work with the legislature to pass a philosophical exemption provision. (The letter to the governor is posted at www.AAPSonline.org.)
“All eyes are on PG County,” said Serkes. “It’s not just a local now, and parents across the country are ready to fight.”