Judicial Ethics Complaints


110 East Main Street, Suite 700
Madison, WI 53703
Phone: (608) 266-7637
Fax: (608) 266-8647
Instructions for Completing

judicial ethics, wisconsin  http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27626

          SCR CHAPTER 60

                       CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT


JUDICIAL COUNCIL COMMITTEE’S NOTE, 1979:  The following rules, called the code of judicial ethics, govern the members of the Wisconsin judiciary. These rules were originally adopted by the supreme court on November 14, 1967, effective January 1, 1968.  They were amended on June 28, 1974; December 23, 1977, March 16, 1978; March 28, 1978; and November 20, 1979.  The rules were originally numbered standards 1 to 16 and rules 1 to 17.  They have been clarified and numbered 60.001 to 60.19 for uniformity and convenience.


  1. Clearfield-doctrine-clearfield-trust-co-v-united-states-318-us-363-1942

    The Erie Doctrine | lawschoolhelp.com

    Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). In Erie, the plaintiff was walking alongside railroad tracks when his right arm  The issue that confronted the Supreme Court was the meaning of the phrase “the laws of the several states Blue Ridge , 356 U.S. 525, 78 S.Ct 893, 2 L.Ed. 2d 953 (1958) the question 

  2. [PDF]

    The Erie Doctrine and State Conflict of Laws Rules – Digital 

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat
    by RJ Weintraub – Cited by 50 – Related articles
    Article 2. 1-1-1964. The Erie Doctrine and State Conflict of Laws Rules. Russell J. controversy which followed: “The laws of the several states, except where the  202, 205 (1938) (“The doctrine [Erie] applies though the question of construction arises not….. York,” in holding that in a diversity case the federal court cannot 

  3. Diversity jurisdiction: Information from Answers.com

    The United States Constitution, in Article III, § 2, gives the Congress the  A U.S. citizen who is domiciled outside the U.S. is not considered to be a citizen of any U.S.state, and cannot be considered an alien. …. Main article: Erie doctrine  Tompkins (1938) that the law to be applied in a diversity case would be the law of 

  4. [PDF]

    what is the erie doctrine? – University of Notre Dame


    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    by AN Steinman – 2008 – Cited by 49 – Related articles
    ion with the subsequent evolution of the Erie doctrine and federal judicial …. B. Erie’s Constitutional Core and the Two Tiers of Federal. Judicial Lawmaking .  1 304 U.S. 64 (1938). 2 It has  have such a hold on us that we can’t leave well enough alone. …. cial power vis-`a-vis the states, would permit the federal judiciary to 

  5. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins – 304 U.S. 64 (1938) :: Justia US 

    supreme.justia.com › … › Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins – 304 US 64

    2. A federal court exercising jurisdiction over such a case on the ground of diversity of The question for decision is whether the oft-challenged doctrine of Swift v.  “The laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, ….. but they cannotfurnish positive rules, or conclusive authority, by which our own 

  6. [PDF]



    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    by WR Casto – 1988 – Cited by 68 – Related articles
    from suggesting that the doctrine be overruled.”14 But the. 4. 41 u.s. (16 Pet.) 1 (1842). 5. Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) (6-2 decision). 6. ld. 7.

  7. [PDF]

    united states district court – Western District of Virginia

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    Hospital, two nurses, Mary B. Atkins and Arthur F. Strunk, and a doctor, Jack L.  304 U.S. 64 (1938), access to a medical review panel is a right that federal courts …. Erie doctrine and the principle that states cannot limit federal jurisdiction, 

  8. [PDF]

    when erie goes international – Northwestern University School of Law

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat – Quick View
    by DE Childress III – 2011 – Cited by 5 – Related articles
    B. Should the Erie Doctrine Apply in International Cases?  1 304 U.S. 64 (1938). 2Hanna v. …… OF THE UNITED STATES 626–28 (1953); 2 WILLIAM WINSLOW ……reasoning, it nonetheless seems clear that since a state court cannot apply .http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-39904/TS-685601.mp3


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s